Mid-Year Employment Law Compliance Requirements Your Business Should Be Familiar With

Authored by Saman Haque

Check out our 2024 employment law checklist to refresh yourself on employment laws that your company should be compliant with along with some specific laws that recently became effective, including:

  • Chicago Paid Leave and Paid Sick & Safe Leave: Effective July 1, 2024, after a 6-month delay in implementation, Chicago’s newest ordinance requiring all employers in the city of Chicago to provide up to 40 hours of paid leave and 40 hours of paid sick leave for employers working in the city is finally in effect. 
  • Chicago’s Minimum Wage Increase: Effective July 1, the City of Chicago’s One Fair Wage Ordinance increased minimum wage from $15.00 per hour to $16.20 per hour for employers with 4 or more workers. 
  • Cook County’s Minimum Wage Increase: Effective July 1, Cook County increased minimum wage from $14.00 per hour to $14.05 per hour. 
  • Illinois Freelance Worker Protection Act: Effective July 1, nearly anyone hired or retained as an independent contractor in Illinois for compensation of at least $500 will be required to have a written contract memorializing the agreement, must pay the worker within 30 days after completion of services or delivery of product, and will be entitled to the same protections against discrimination, harassment, or retaliatory behavior that employees are protected from. 
  • Colorado Job Application Fairness Act: Effective July 1, employers will be prohibited from seeking any information that could reveal an applicant’s age including but not limited to attendance and graduation dates from educational institutions. Employers should ensure that information sought does not inadvertently reveal information about an applicant’s age. 
  • California Workplace Violence Prevention Plan: Effective July 1, all California employers that have 10 or more employees are required to implement a workplace violence prevention plan that creates policies to identify workplace hazards, implement routine assessments of potential workplace violence, conduct employee trainings, and create reporting and investigation processes. 
  • New York Paid Lactation Breaks Updated: Effective June 19, New York requires that employees be provided at least 30 minutes of paid break time to express breast milk for their nursing child up to three years follow the birth of a child. The State Department of Labor provided additional guidance that says 20 minutes once every three hours was a reasonable amount of time for breaks.

If you found this checklist helpful, subscribe to LP3. If you have questions, do not hesitate to reach out to LP’s Employment & Executive

Invitation: How Non-Traditional Relationships with Outside Lawyers Can Elevate Your Team

LP Partner Laura Friedel and Christine Binotti of Motorola Solutions will share their non-traditional approach to supporting the HR and M&A deal teams and how it’s benefited their teams during a lunch program sponsored by the Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) on September 27, 2023, from 11:30-1:00 p.m. CST. LP will be hosting the event in our Chicago office.

For more information and to register click here.

Preparing for 2024: Employment Law Update

Please join us on September 21st for a complimentary webinar geared towards human resources professionals, in-house counsel, business owners, and senior leaders. We will review developments over the past year and discuss what you need to be doing to be ready for 2024.

Topics will include:

  • New job posting and pay disclosure requirements
  • Illinois’ new PTO requirements and other PTO/leave-related developments
  • Increased scrutiny of non-competes and non-solicits
  • Employment law implications of data privacy and AI
  • Required changes to standard policies and documents to comply with new NLRB standards
  • Changing independent contractor classification standards
  • Supreme Court’s religious accommodation and affirmative action decisions
  • State law developments that will impact your business, including new non-discrimination, expense reimbursement, and marijuana laws

CLE & HRCI credits available

Thursday, September 21, 2023 | 11:00 am – 1:00 pm CDT

‘Quiet Quitting’ Is Getting Louder – 7 Ways Employers Can Bolster Employee Engagement and Address the Risks of ‘Loud Quitting’

Author Becky Canary-King

Employers have been concerned about “quiet quitting” for some time now, looking for ways to foster employee engagement and productivity. And new data shows the importance of doing so because “quiet quitting” has turned into “loud quitting.”

According to a new report from Gallup of more than 120,000 global employees, 18% of global employees are loudly quitting or actively disengaged. Contrary to quiet quitting, when employees do the bare minimum of their job, “loud quitting” is when employees do things that directly harm the company, undermine the company’s goals, or rebel against leadership. Loud quitting can look like a social media post bashing company leadership or vociferously complaining to co-workers about the organization.

If the underlying causes aren’t fixed, they can lead to resignations and recruiting challenges, so it’s important that employers take these risks seriously. To exacerbate the problem, the negative energy of loud quitting can spread throughout the company, hurting morale and making it harder to address.

In addition to the 18% of global employees engaged in “loud quitting,” the same survey revealed that 59% are quiet quitting. Only 23% of survey respondents said they are thriving or engaged at work.

There are several ways to foster a positive workplace culture that encourages employee engagement and promotes productivity. Many of these suggestions will help fend off quiet quitting before it turns loud.

7 Tips for Bolstering Employee Engagement and Promoting a Productive Workforce

  1. Ask for Feedback – and Listen. Employers should regularly seek feedback in a way that facilitates honest and helpful information. And employers should let employees know that they are listening. When an employee doesn’t feel like they are being heard, their feedback may become louder and unhealthy. Even if you can’t directly address an employee’s concern, acknowledge it and explain why you cannot do what they are asking now.
  2. Conduct Exit Interviews. Employers can gain valuable information during exit interviews, and it may also prevent someone from voicing their complaints to a wider audience. Listen to their concerns and use the feedback to address any issues.
  3. Give Consistent Feedback. Performance reviews should not be limited to the end of the year. Instead, check in with employees to address performance concerns as they arise, so there is no hiding from responsibilities. For instance, at LP, we recently transformed our process for giving and receiving feedback via casual “check-ins” and annual reviews to “F2=Feedback + Future” conversations, which are intentional discussions between group leads and their team members to share feedback and discuss future plans and goals. For more information on our revamped feedback process, see Feedback Is a Vital Tool of Lifelong Learning—How We’ve Revamped the Process.
  4. Create Clear Job Descriptions. Employees should have clear expectations for their position, even if they are expected to have some flexibility and jump in as needs arise. If their job duties change significantly, their job description – and title and compensation – should also be updated.
  5. Reward High Performers. Employees who don’t see upward mobility or their role in the company’s future may struggle with motivation, thinking there is no point in working hard. Creating a work environment where high performers are rewarded with promotions or increased compensation motivates employees to continue putting their best foot forward.
  6. Foster Positive Social Connections. Particularly in remote or hybrid work environments, workplace “silos” can become prominent, and employees can feel disconnected from their teams. Conversely, employees who are integrated into their work teams are more motivated to not let their team members down with poor performance or missed deadlines. Social connections within the workplace can also foster a sense of camaraderie and fulfillment. But be mindful of the potential for cliques that inhibit inclusivity and the risk of loud quitters hurting company morale.
  7. Foster a Compassionate Workplace. The hustle culture often ignores mental health and can lead to burnout or quiet quitting. By paying attention to employees’ well-being – physical and mental – employers can reduce absenteeism, boost productivity, and improve morale. A compassionate workplace also helps employees feel respected and recognized.

Building an engaged workforce is an ongoing process for each employer’s work environment. LP’s employment and executive compensation attorneys can help you develop a strategy for boosting employee engagement. If you have questions, please don’t hesitate to reach out.

Three Takeaways from the EEOC’s Guidance on the Use of AI in Making Employment Decisions

Author Becky Canary-King

Artificial intelligence (AI), algorithmic programs, and software tools continue to have far-reaching (and sometimes unlikely) effects, including in our professional lives. There are now a wide variety of AI and algorithmic tools available to assist employers in recruitment and employee management.  

However, these tools come with some risks, including unintentional discriminatory effects. Title VII and the ADA prohibit employers from using selection procedures that disproportionately exclude employees or applicants based on race, color, national origin, religion, disability or sex, unless the procedures are job-related and consistent with business necessity. Even if job-related, employers must consider if there are available alternatives.  

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently issued a technical assistance document on assessing adverse impacts when using AI. This guidance builds on previous guidance from the EEOC on AI and the Americans with Disabilities Act.  

Below are three key takeaways for employers who use, or are interested in using, AI or other algorithmic tools to assist in hiring, performance management, or other employment decisions: 

  1. Employers cannot assume that AI tools are non-discriminatory. 

While AI tools may appear neutral, they can result in unintentional discriminatory effects. For example, an AI tool may automatically screen out applicants based on large gaps in employment. This could have a disparate impact on the basis of sex, as gaps in employment may be result of pregnancy or leaving the workforce to raise children. This tool may also screen out individuals with disabilities who have gaps in employment for disability-related treatments.  

The EEOC encourages employers to proactively analyze their employment practices, including software and AI tools, on an ongoing basis to ensure there are no such adverse impacts. 

  1. Employers should consider available alternatives if AI tools cause an adverse impact. 

Employers can assess whether a selection procedure has an adverse impact on a particular protected group by checking whether use of the procedure causes a selection rate for individuals in the group that is “substantially” less than the selection rate for individuals in another group. The general rule of thumb is that a selection rate is substantially different than another if their ratio is less than four-fifths (or 80%), however, courts often look to statistical significance when assessing adverse impact.  

If the selection procedure has an adverse impact, the employer should consider whether the use of the tool is job-related and consistent with business necessity and whether there are alternatives that may have less of a disparate impact. 

  1. Employers can be responsible for AI tools designed or administered by a vendor. 

The guidance makes clear that an employer can be responsible for adverse impacts in their selection procedures, even if the tool was developed by an outside vendor or carried out by an agent administering the tool on its behalf.  

The EEOC suggests that employers ask the vendor, at a minimum, if it has assessed whether the tool causes a substantially lower selection rate for individuals within a protected group. Additionally, language can be built into vendor contracts requiring the use of non-discriminatory selection tools.  

We continue to monitor and stay abreast of developments related to the rapidly changing world of AI and will provide updates as necessary. If you have any questions about the use of AI or algorithmic decision-making tools in your workplace, please don’t hesitate to reach out. 

How the Secure Act 2.0 Affects ESOPs, 401(k)s, and Other Retirement Plans

Authors Kevin Burch, Kristy Britsch, Kenneth Kneubuhler

The Secure Act 2.0 of 2022, enacted in the closing days of 2022, makes a substantial number of changes to tax-qualified retirement plans, most of which are intended to increase plan coverage and retirement savings. Although we continue to digest the hundreds of pages of new law, here we summarize certain key changes that affect ESOPs, KSOPs, and 401(k) plans:

  • Cash-Out Limits. The limit for involuntary distributions to a participant prior to attaining normal retirement age is increased from $5,000 to $7,000 for distributions after 2023.  The current maximum cash-out limit in ESOPs, KSOPs, and 401(k) plans is $5,000 and generally applies to participants that terminate employment with a vested account balance lower than the cash-out threshold in the plan.
  • RMD Age. The age to start taking “required minimum distributions” increases to age 73 in 2023 for participants who reach age 72 in 2023 through 2032 and to age 75 for participants who reach age 74 in or after 2033. Also, beginning in 2024, plans will not be required to include Roth contribution balances in required minimum distributions prior to the participant’s death.  This represents a further change from the increase to age 72 under the first Secure Act, which took effect January 1, 2020, for distributions to participants born after June 30, 1949.
  • Deferral of Gain on Stock Sales to ESOPs. The rule allowing C Corporation shareholders to defer gain on the sale of shares to an ESOP is expanded to cover S Corporation shareholders, but only for sales to an ESOP after 2027 and only for up to 10% of the gain. 
  • Standards for FMV on sales to ESOPS. The Department of Labor, in consultation with the Internal Revenue Service, is directed to provide guidance on acceptable standards and procedures for establishing the “good faith fair market value for shares of a business” to be acquired by ESOP. We will provide additional information on this topic as it is released.
  • Mandatory Automatic 401(k) Enrollment. Starting in 2025, new KSOPs and 401(k) plans (those adopted after the December 29, 2022 enactment date) will be required to automatically enroll eligible employees, at a contribution rate of at least 3%. Thereafter, these new plans must increase a participant’s automatic contribution rate by 1% each year until the participant’s contribution rate reaches at least 10% (but the plan may provide for increases up to 15%). As under the current law, participants may stop contributions or change their deferral rates.
  • Coverage of Part-Time Employees in KSOPs and 401(k) Plans. Current law requires part-time employees who worked at least 500 hours in three consecutive years beginning after 2020 and reach age 21 be allowed to make 401(k) contributions.  January 1, 2024, is the first date that this provision could require a part-time employee be eligible. The new law reduces the service requirement to two years effective for plan years beginning after 2024. Neither the prior law nor the new law requires that the part-time employees be allocated employer contributions.
  • Vested Employer Contributions may be treated as Roth Contributions. Beginning with contributions made after the December 29, 2022 enactment date, plans may allow participants to elect to have employer-matching contributions and nonelective contributions that are fully vested when made to be treated as Roth contributions.
  • Catch-up Contributions by Highly Compensated Participants must be ROTH. Beginning in 2024, 401(k) catch-up contributions by a participant who had compensation over $145,000 (adjusted for cost of living) for the prior calendar year must be treated as Roth contributions. Participants earning no more than $145,000 in the prior year must be allowed to elect Roth treatment for their catch-up contributions (assuming at least one participant eligible for catch-up contributions earned over $145,000 in the prior year).

If you have any questions about Secure Act 2.0, please reach out to a member of LP’s ESOP Team.

FTC Proposes New Rule to Ban Non-Competes

On January 5, 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) proposed a new rule restricting the use of non-compete agreements as an “unfair method of competition” in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act. The proposed rule would (i) ban employers from entering into non-compete agreements with workers and (ii) require employers to rescind existing non-competes. As defined in the proposed rule, “non-compete agreements” would include any clauses or agreements between an employer and worker that prevent the person from working for a competitor or starting a competing business after their employment ends.  

Notably, the proposed rule covers non-competes between employers and “workers,” which would include not only employees, but also independent contractors, interns, volunteers, apprentices, and sole proprietors.  However, as drafted, the proposed rule does not appear to prohibit agreements that limit post-employment solicitation of or acceptance of business from the company’s clients or customers, so long as the provision doesn’t have the same result as a traditional non-compete.

It’s also important to note that, the proposed rule would not apply to non-competes in connection with the sale of a business if the person restricted by the non-compete is a substantial owner of the business (at least 25% ownership interest) at the time the non-compete is executed. The rule also would not apply to franchise relationships.

In her dissenting statement to the proposed rule, FTC Commissioner Christine Wilson raised potential challenges to the rule, including: (i) a lack of authority for the FTC to enact the rule, (ii) questions regarding whether the FTC has Congressional authorization to enact the rule, and (iii) questions about whether the rule is an impermissible delegation of legislative authority.

The FTC is currently seeking public comment on the rule through March 10, 2023. 

We will continue to monitor the rule and provide updates as they become available. If you have questions about the proposed rule, non-competes or other employment matter, do not hesitate to reach out to LP’s Employment & Executive Compensation Group.

New Unpaid Leave Requirements Under Illinois Family Bereavement Leave Act Went into Effect January 1, 2023

The new Illinois Family Bereavement Leave Act took effect on January 1, 2023. The new requirements apply to employers who are covered by the federal Family and Medical Leave Act. Under the law, employees are entitled to 10 days of unpaid bereavement leave to: 

  • Attend the funeral, make arrangements for, or grieve the death of a “covered family member” (a step/child, spouse, domestic partner, sibling, step/parent, parent-in-law, grandchild or grandparent) 
  • Be absent from work due to fertility-related issues such as a miscarriage, unsuccessful round of assisted reproduction, failed adoption or surrogacy, or stillbirth 

Employees are entitled to up to a total of six weeks of unpaid bereavement leave in the event of two deaths of a covered family member in a twelve-month period.

For additional information regarding state and local employment law updates, we share this video on local and state law updates.

If you have questions, please reach out to a member of LP’s Employment & Executive Compensation Group.

Lessons and Reminders for Employers from Elon Musk’s Employment-Related Actions at Twitter

Since taking control of Twitter at the end of October, Elon Musk has been making news headlines for all the wrong reasons. Shortly after the acquisition was complete, he fired nearly half of Twitter’s workforce – before hiring some of these employees back a few days later. He fired employees who criticized him (even those who did so privately)—including firing employees by tweet—and eliminated contractors.

On November 16th, he sent an early-morning email to all Twitter employees with the subject line “A Fork in the Road.” In the email, Musk gave Twitter employees an ultimatum: continue working “extremely hard core” or be let go with three months of severance.

“In an increasingly competitive world, we will need to be extremely hard core,” he wrote. “This will mean working long hours at high intensity. Only exceptional performance will constitute a passing grade.”

Since taking control of Twitter, Musk’s employment decisions have occupied prime real estate in the media and faced harsh criticism from former employees, business leaders, and industry experts. 

We know that our clients and readers are unlikely to take actions as drastic as Musk. Still, the Twitter chaos has sparked conversations about the legality and rationality of Musk’s employment decisions at Twitter. 

What employers should know about making employment termination decisions and announcing layoffs

  1. Employers must comply with WARN Act notice requirements when laying off large groups of employees. The federal WARN Act requires employers to notify the workforce of a mass layoff, a temporary shutdown, or a closure of all or part of a business. Employers that fail to provide adequate notice could be on the hook for damages of back pay and benefits-related compensation per employee for each day the company violated the WARN Act (up to 60 days). Many states, including Illinois, also have laws similar to the WARN Act.
  2. Have difficult conversations, including terminations and layoffs, on a one-on-one basis. Even if you can’t be in the same room as the person physically due to a remote workplace, the employee’s manager should have a personal conversation with the employee over video conference.
  3. Review employment contracts before making termination decisions. If the employee has an employment contract in place, you’ll want to understand the terms of that agreement before making any employment decisions or discussing termination.
  4. Don’t name-call. The reasons for termination can be communicated, whether company downsizing or poor performance, but avoid name-calling or using insults to criticize (current or former) employees.
  5. Discuss layoffs and other employment separations with employment counsel before making decisions. An employment attorney can help guide you through the termination process so that it goes as smoothly as possible and you minimize the risk of any potential legal action from a disgruntled ex-employee.

If you have any questions regarding remote workplace issues, please reach out. A member of our Employment & Executive Compensation Group would be happy to speak with you.

Additional Information:

How to Effectively and Compassionately Handle Dismissals and Layoffs in a Remote Workplace

3 Reminders for Employers After an Employee Is Awarded $450,000 for His Unwanted Birthday Party

Supreme Court Halts OSHA Vaccine/Testing Mandate, But Permits Healthcare Industry Requirement

Author: Laura Friedel

This afternoon, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked the OSHA Emergency Temporary Standard (“ETS”) that would have required all employers with 100+ employees to mandate vaccination or testing, while allowing the Department of Health and Human Services’ vaccine mandate for those touching healthcare facilities to go into effect. In striking down the OSHA requirement, the Court found that OSHA had exceeded its authority by implementing a requirement that was not specific to workplace safety.

Here are the key takeaways for employers:

  • The OSHA ETS is blocked, so there is no requirement for employers to implement a vaccination/testing requirement (other than in specific industries). 
  • Employers that want to implement a vaccine and/or testing requirement may do so, subject to legal requirements (including both accommodation obligations and state limitations on vaccine/testing mandates).
  • In states that prohibit or limit vaccine/testing requirements, employers will have to comply with those prohibitions/limitations and won’t be able to rely on the OSHA ETS as a reason to implement.
  • Employers that touch healthcare facilities need to comply with the Department of Health and Human Services vaccine mandate.
  • It’s possible that state or local government authorities may take steps to implement mandates – it remains to be seen which do so, and whether they are upheld.